Exploring Moroccan Teachers’ Perspectives on Integrating ChatGPT into Higher Education Curriculum

https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v7i6.2389

Authors

  • Fatima Chahboune Chouaib Doukkali University
  • Hicham Zyad Applied Language and Culture Studies Lab, Chouaib Doukkali University, Morocco

Keywords:

Keywords : ChatGPT, Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Higher education, Perceived Usefulnes (PU), Perceived ease of use (PEU), Barriers to ChatGPT adoption

Abstract

This study explores Moroccan teachers’ perspectives on ChatGPT-Assisted Language Teaching in higher education. It examines the various factors and barriers influencing the integration of ChatGPT into teaching practices. This study is framed within Technology Acceptance Model (Davis,1989). TAM encompasses the constructs that this study aims at exploring: Perceived usefulness (PU), perceived ease of use (PEU), perceived risk (PR), attitude and actual use (ChatGPT practices). An online questionnaire was administered to 50 professors in different Moroccan universities. Descriptive statistics show that most professors hold favorable perceptions of integrating ChatGPT in teaching practices. Notably, key barriers to ChatGPT adoption include ethical concerns, lack of training, and insufficient AI knowledge. Correlational analysis shows that PU and   PEU significantly influence the actual use of ChatGPT. In contrast, there is no significant correlation between perceived risk and use. This study suggests that offering AI-training programs could enhance the integration of ChatGPT in Moroccan academia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Hicham Zyad, Applied Language and Culture Studies Lab, Chouaib Doukkali University, Morocco

Doctor Hicham Zyad is a Professor of Applied Linguistics and Cultural Studies at Chouaib Doukkali University, Morocco.

Published

2025-11-01

How to Cite

Chahboune, F., & Zyad, H. (2025). Exploring Moroccan Teachers’ Perspectives on Integrating ChatGPT into Higher Education Curriculum. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 7(6), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v7i6.2389