Investigating Google Translation App Reliance on Enhancing EFL Learners’ Language Proficiency

https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v7i5.2317

Authors

  • Ali Ahmed Suleimana College of Languages and Translation, Islamic University of Minnesota
  • Intisar Zakariya Ahmed Ibrahim Department of English and Translation College of Science and Arts, Qassim University, Ar Rass, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
  • Imadeldin Omer Ahmed Yahya Assistant Professor, Al-Khaleej for Training and Education at King Saud University, Saudi Arabia

Keywords:

Google Translate App, EFL learners, language proficiency, vocabulary acquisition, pronunciation accuracy, and machine translation.

Abstract

This study focuses on the impact of Google Translate (GTA) on EFL learners' language proficiency, specifically its advantages and disadvantages. The survey data and literature review revealed that while many learners are frequent users of GTA, particularly for vocabulary (median=4.0) and pronunciation (median=4.0), the correlations to improvement were substantial for vocabulary (?=0.72) and pronunciation (?=0.68). However, the correlations for writing (?=0.28) and comprehension (?=0.45) were weaker, suggesting limited contributions to the more complex skills of writing and comprehension. These findings also suggest that GTA may contribute to immediate improvement in vocabulary and pronunciation, but in terms of complex skills, the direct relationship between GTAs and improvement will be influenced by other contextual factors in EFL learning situations. This study emphasizes the immediate contributions to vocabulary and pronunciation while also highlighting the complexities and subtleties of incorporating GTA into language teaching and learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2025-09-01

How to Cite

Suleimana, A. A. ., Ibrahim, I. Z. A. ., & Yahya, I. O. A. . (2025). Investigating Google Translation App Reliance on Enhancing EFL Learners’ Language Proficiency. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 7(5), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v7i5.2317