African Art and The Colonial Encounter: Commodification and Restitution of Sacred Objects in Linus Asong’s the Crown of Thorns

https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v5i2.1293

Authors

  • DORA NYUYKIGHAN MBU Department of African Literature and Civilisations Univeristy of Yaounde I, Cameroon

Keywords:

Commodification, Sacred Objects, Restitution, Postcolonialism, Museums

Abstract

African art though dynamic has changed in form, function, and meaning over time. However, the concept of Indigenous African art has remained static. This paper aims at examining the complex relationship between African art and colonial encounter while interrogating the commodification and restitution of African artifacts which has become a topical issue. This is because pre-colonial sacred objects have an aura of untainted timeless past reflecting the way of life of the African people. The colonial encounter with Africa witnessed a rush for African traditional religious artifacts and antiquities which left indelible marks of hostilities and cultural clashes among the African people. Many African artifacts looted from their countries of origin during colonialism and are now housed in museums and private collections around the world. While most studies on Linus Asong’s the Crown of Thorns focus on feminist analysis, the paper is read from the perspective of New Historicists’ exegesis that interrogates the commodification and restitution of African sacred objects stolen from Africa during colonialism. The findings show that, although the issue of the commodification and restitution of African artifacts is a complex and controversial one, there is a growing recognition of the importance of acknowledging and rectifying the historical injustices associated with their commodification.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2023-07-22

How to Cite

MBU, D. N. (2023). African Art and The Colonial Encounter: Commodification and Restitution of Sacred Objects in Linus Asong’s the Crown of Thorns. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 5(2), 400–412. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v5i2.1293

Issue

Section

Articles